Thread: I got one
View Single Post
 
Old 11-21-2006, 08:42 PM   #44 (permalink)
iReV
 
GV Senior - Level 10
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 697

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace is SiK
omg stop analyzing the systems together.. im not saying that...

im saying that with leaps and bounds the ps3 has advanced much further than its counterpart the 360...

the 360 pretty much only offered better graphics thats it..

the ps3 offers..... Wireless connectivity, those new controllers.. that in someways.. u move and it moves the person, if im rite u can connect with other ps3's wirelessly.. no it does not have a working online community yet.. but like i said.. its not like the 360 added nethign to the already great xbox live idea.... im saying that the ps3 offers much more advancements than the 360 in my opinion....

ps3 offers... up to 60gb of harddrive... a blue ray drive... a HDMI port... a bluetooth controller, and a built in Wi-Fi, a full built in internet access, and full backwards compatability.....

the ps3 is more of a homeentertainment system then nethign else...

the 360 does not offer, a blue ray drive, the new controller (which is entirely revolutionary look it up if you havent already read about it), a built in Wi-Fi, Full internet access, and full backwards compatability... i would rather have a ps3 neday.. (assuming its free)
that's just the thing though. 60 gb HD...useless. 100-200 bucks for an additional 40 gigs. can you spell rip off?

hdmi? you can get it with the xbox 360 addon. hdmi doesn't offer substantial advantages over component connections for home setups. digital does not trump analog signal for all intensive purposes unless it is a movie theatre setup. i've been through two years of ECE, i know.

blu-ray? can you spell obsolete in the next few years? nothing revolutionary buddy. optical formats are dumb to begin with.

built in internet access? what does that even mean? you can connect to the internet with anything PC or console since 1999. no big deal.

but the whole point here is negated because playstation doesn't have online. so you give points of sony introducing albeit new, but useless features. yeah ps2 had 'online'. but it's a joke not even worthy of the name. great you can have a WLAN or connect to the internet wireless. too bad you can't game/have no one to game with online. it's like owning a rice rocket with cool fenders and wings, but with no engine to back it up.

what does the ps3 offer? marginally better graphics? that's right i said it. MARGINALLY better. every developer has gone on the record in saying that the 360 is perfectly capable of putting out graphics that the ps3 can. lol even the maker of mgs4 said the same thing. not to mention that its harder to program for/isn't even designed with gaming in mind.

seriously you need to relook your post and think logically here. you're saying the ps3 is good because 'its improved the most'. you dont give points to a retard who gets an A in remedial math for the first time. sorry, but i dont give my dollars to 'most improved system'. i give my dollars to 'the good system'. come on.

i like the wii a lot, 360 for h3/shooter games. the ps3 is just garbage.

Last edited by iReV : 11-21-2006 at 08:51 PM.
iReV is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Sponsored Links: MPAA | Mortgage | Payday Loan | Advertising | Credit Card Consolidation