FB scrims CbN - Page 3

.aMp. · 03-14-2007, 09:48 AM

Even with that being said though, there connections from a 12 foot radius are connecting a hell of a lot better than those hundreds of miles away lol. It's not called host though its called 'less latency' like Phalanx mentioned, which is still an advantage.

Mathiasa · 03-14-2007, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Severed

I KNOW!
OMG KIDS LISTEN UP! :

there can only be ONE host in a game. ONE. all the other people can be connecting well or like... yea. the point is, is that there can only be one host in a game. i am soooo suprised by the amount of people who dont know this. i think im gonna go puke me guts out again

If they were playing on the same host, ofc there wouldnt be anyone being host.
You can host a game, meaning its you having the game.
But when playing on a LAN it doesn't make any difference.

Via Xbox Live, you NEED a host.

Otherwise it wouldn't work, but them being all on the same connection doesn't matter for the other team.

PhaLanX · 03-14-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by .aMp.

Even with that being said though, there connections from a 12 foot radius are connecting a hell of a lot better than those hundreds of miles away lol. It's not called host though its called 'less latency' like Phalanx mentioned, which is still an advantage.

Right, its still an advantage... but no more of an advantage than Jaynz living near me (when I lived in RI) and me being host.

Torrent · 03-14-2007, 10:16 AM

actually it's not hard to see that, even if you take away strongside hosting and the fact that there will always be latency and all those issues, there is the issue of communication, FB's will of course be much better, because they are actually together, they can see each others screens and it's overall much easier for them to interact in their LAN center than it is for CbN over Live, so their teamwork would be better

like i said, i'm not a CbN fan at all, but i'm just saying, CbN obviously wasn't on even ground, I'd be much more impressed if FB had won while splitting hosts with CbN, as thats how it will end up, only CbN will get choice of which games to host at Charlotte

PhaLanX · 03-14-2007, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torrent

they can see each others screens and it's overall much easier for them to interact in their LAN center than it is for CbN over Live, so their teamwork would be better

That is a GREAT point, that I completely overlooked. They can communicate while dead and look at eahc other screens while CbN could not. That would deifnately explain some of the lopsidedness. Nice thinking on that one.

Kombat Frank · 03-14-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Torrent

actually it's not hard to see that, even if you take away strongside hosting and the fact that there will always be latency and all those issues, there is the issue of communication, FB's will of course be much better, because they are actually together, they can see each others screens and it's overall much easier for them to interact in their LAN center than it is for CbN over Live, so their teamwork would be better

like i said, i'm not a CbN fan at all, but i'm just saying, CbN obviously wasn't on even ground, I'd be much more impressed if FB had won while splitting hosts with CbN, as thats how it will end up, only CbN will get choice of which games to host at Charlotte

i really dont understand how you know who has host, how they were all playing in the same room, how CBN wasnt playing togather...

i duno were you get your info

PhaLanX · 03-14-2007, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FresH as FranK

i really dont understand how you know who has host, how they were all playing in the same room, how CBN wasnt playing togather...

i duno were you get your info

It was said on MLGpro by members of CbN. I dont think they would lie about it.. and if they did thats just pathetic

shake · 03-14-2007, 10:29 AM

Yea, how do you even know if they were all in the same room? You don't. I don't care what people say, the only people who know are the guys from FB and maybe CbN.

-edit-
Pf, CbN said it eh? Slackers.... and liers!

QUINN · 03-14-2007, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FresH as FranK

i really dont understand how you know who has host, how they were all playing in the same room, how CBN wasnt playing togather...

i duno were you get your info

Because Ghostcryame went straight to the mlgpro forums about how they were quadhosting at a lan center and strongside was host. I then decided that ghost is fat and retarded and I would give him a lesson in professionalim

Torrent · 03-14-2007, 10:55 AM

they say there are gameplays

thatd be awesome

03-14-2007, 09:48 AM	#21 (permalink)
.aMp. I'm done now Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: not sweating video games Posts: 9,543 MoNeY bre	Even with that being said though, there connections from a 12 foot radius are connecting a hell of a lot better than those hundreds of miles away lol. It's not called host though its called 'less latency' like Phalanx mentioned, which is still an advantage. __________________ '90 N/A Tampa Bay Z Club. Only room to grow, progression is everything. thg here, .amp. asked me to remove him from the site, but to avoid messing with the forum database I simply moved his post count down to zero. Edit: changing the post count didn't work so I'm just going to leave it for now.

03-14-2007, 10:29 AM	#28 (permalink)
shake GV Elder Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: MD Posts: 5,619 Leakysoup	Yea, how do you even know if they were all in the same room? You don't. I don't care what people say, the only people who know are the guys from FB and maybe CbN. -edit- Pf, CbN said it eh? Slackers.... and liers! __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-14-2007, 10:16 AM	#24 (permalink)
Torrent Jr. Member - Level 3 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Torrrrronto Posts: 38 xToRrEnT	actually it's not hard to see that, even if you take away strongside hosting and the fact that there will always be latency and all those issues, there is the issue of communication, FB's will of course be much better, because they are actually together, they can see each others screens and it's overall much easier for them to interact in their LAN center than it is for CbN over Live, so their teamwork would be better like i said, i'm not a CbN fan at all, but i'm just saying, CbN obviously wasn't on even ground, I'd be much more impressed if FB had won while splitting hosts with CbN, as thats how it will end up, only CbN will get choice of which games to host at Charlotte

03-14-2007, 10:55 AM	#30 (permalink)
Torrent Jr. Member - Level 3 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Torrrrronto Posts: 38 xToRrEnT	they say there are gameplays thatd be awesome

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)