I see no reason to play Halo 3 again

[MattBleez]

I find that the sniping and the br are very accurate. You simply can't swipe as much as before.


The aiming etc is fine, the spray is fine.

My problem? It's way to slow, and the maps are garbage.



Halo deserves 1 map above all. Warlock/Wizard. Although Midship was also awesome, this map was in h1 and h2, plus it is perfectly symmetrical, arena based, fast paced goodness. Why play 1v1's on this map? Because skill won that game. 1v1 may be a different game, but if you look for individual skill, this map is where to prove yourself.

back to h3...


It's too slow, and I haven't played a single person I've thought was good (as in I played him, and I was wow'ed)

I was wow'd by good players a lot in H2. I haven't played anyone in h3 I would even htink of putting in this category.

I see kids with sooo many games played, but with my 200 or so games, I still know what they know.






Basically, the game appeals to the mass public because the mass public never played multiplayer to become competitive. For the competitive players, it will suck because it allows bad people to be good.


H1 skill > h2 skill >>>> h3 skill.

And the skill factor, is what makes this game suck.

yours,

[shake]

Originally Posted by MattBleez

Basically, the game appeals to the mass public because the mass public never played multiplayer to become competitive. For the competitive players, it will suck because it allows bad people to be good.

I have to disagree here, Halo 2 is a game that made bad people good. All those people who thought they were good play Halo 3 and suck. Of course, there are weapons that allow for easy kills now(shotgun, spartan laser, sword, brute hammer, etc). But if I get in a 1v1 situation, odds are the person I'm fighting isn't going to touch me, and I've played maybe 20 total games. But then again, I don't suck at life so yea....

[Kombat Frank]

Originally Posted by shake

I have to disagree here, Halo 2 is a game that made bad people good. All those people who thought they were good play Halo 3 and suck. Of course, there are weapons that allow for easy kills now(shotgun, spartan laser, sword, brute hammer, etc). But if I get in a 1v1 situation, odds are the person I'm fighting isn't going to touch me, and I've played maybe 20 total games. But then again, I don't suck at life so yea....

yeah i agree with leaky on this one


all the people from h2 who thought they were so bad ass find that in h3 they arent soo pwnzorzz because you have to be more accurate, and you have to just generally be a smarter player...i think this is because h3 centers on balance, bungie tried to make the game as balanced as possible and i thinkt they were succesfull

in places they made stronger, they also made other places weaker

[ll Derive ll]

Originally Posted by MattBleez

back to h3...


It's too slow, and I haven't played a single person I've thought was good (as in I played him, and I was wow'ed)

I was wow'd by good players a lot in H2. I haven't played anyone in h3 I would even htink of putting in this category.

I see kids with sooo many games played, but with my 200 or so games, I still know what they know.






Basically, the game appeals to the mass public because the mass public never played multiplayer to become competitive. For the competitive players, it will suck because it allows bad people to be good.


H1 skill > h2 skill >>>> h3 skill.

And the skill factor, is what makes this game suck.

yours,

Your comparing a TWEAKED MLG for a game that has had massive updates to Matchmaking for a game that hasnt been out for even 3 months. It's honestly not fair.

I ****ing hate everyone that bashes Halo 3 and praises Halo 2 because of it, You can't compare the two of them, because one has been out for 3 years, the other 3 months.



That's like saying a 3 month old infant is such a dumb little **** compared to a 3 year old.

[shake]

Originally Posted by ll Derive ll

Your comparing a TWEAKED MLG for a game that has had massive updates to Matchmaking for a game that hasnt been out for even 3 months. It's honestly not fair.

I ****ing hate everyone that bashes Halo 3 and praises Halo 2 because of it, You can't compare the two of them, because one has been out for 3 years, the other 3 months.



That's like saying a 3 month old infant is such a dumb little **** compared to a 3 year old.

Infants are dumbfucks though

[ll Derive ll]

Originally Posted by shake

Infants are dumbfucks though

Racist.

[dandamanyo22]

Originally Posted by Kombat Frank

yeah i agree with leaky on this one


all the people from h2 who thought they were so bad ass find that in h3 they arent soo pwnzorzz because you have to be more accurate, and you have to just generally be a smarter player...i think this is because h3 centers on balance, bungie tried to make the game as balanced as possible and i thinkt they were succesfull

in places they made stronger, they also made other places weaker

completely disagree they made the game easier, made it so your have a second after someone beats you down to still get a beat down onto them and win, the whole game is close range, and theres no point to picking up a sniper, which in every game should be a super weapon thats able to turn a game around. over shield is another big thing they turned around and said hey lets make it so they can take like 2 extra bullets, the overshield is something a team should fight over like in h2, only good thing is when you pick it up in h3 you're invincible for like 10 seconds until it gets to full. AR is garbo and usually no1 carries it unless they can't find one of the 50 maulers on the ground. I just think Bungie should of went through some more testing with stuff, before they release the game and then went back fixed it and then sent it out. Nothing in the game is balanced unless its mauler vs mauler or AR vs AR which its pretty much who ever gets the luckier spred and they win the beat down no matter what.

[shake]

Originally Posted by ll Derive ll

Racist.

I'm sorry, the person you are trying to reach cannot receive messages. Please try again later, good bye.

[Kombat Frank]

Originally Posted by dandamanyo22

completely disagree they made the game easier, made it so your have a second after someone beats you down to still get a beat down onto them and win, the whole game is close range, and theres no point to picking up a sniper, which in every game should be a super weapon thats able to turn a game around. over shield is another big thing they turned around and said hey lets make it so they can take like 2 extra bullets, the overshield is something a team should fight over like in h2, only good thing is when you pick it up in h3 you're invincible for like 10 seconds until it gets to full. AR is garbo and usually no1 carries it unless they can't find one of the 50 maulers on the ground. I just think Bungie should of went through some more testing with stuff, before they release the game and then went back fixed it and then sent it out. Nothing in the game is balanced unless its mauler vs mauler or AR vs AR which its pretty much who ever gets the luckier spred and they win the beat down no matter what.

haha i dont understand were you get this...how is h3 all close range, the maps are ****in huuuge, ther isnt 1 small map, close range happens but not as much as midship lol or even lockout

the sniper is still a power weapon, everyone still fights over sniper, rockets, shotguns, and now the laser

i also love what they did to the OS, they made is soo you couldnt go on a 6 kill killing spree because you found the OS on the map, now the OS allows you to take out an opponent, and maybe his friend if you have teh skillz....not the entire team 3 times over

and in h3 you can have a BR and stand a chance against a guy sniping across the map, because the BR actually does damage in far distances, as for the guy who is sniping, he actually has to have some sniping skill, and smarts to get the kill

[dandamanyo22]

Originally Posted by Kombat Frank

haha i dont understand were you get this...how is h3 all close range, the maps are ****in huuuge, ther isnt 1 small map, close range happens but not as much as midship lol or even lockout

the sniper is still a power weapon, everyone still fights over sniper, rockets, shotguns, and now the laser

i also love what they did to the OS, they made is soo you couldnt go on a 6 kill killing spree because you found the OS on the map, now the OS allows you to take out an opponent, and maybe his friend if you have teh skillz....not the entire team 3 times over

and in h3 you can have a BR and stand a chance against a guy sniping across the map, because the BR actually does damage in far distances, as for the guy who is sniping, he actually has to have some sniping skill, and smarts to get the kill

besides theres not many maps to chose from but these are small: guardian, isolation, epitath, and snow bound somewhat becuase everyone is underground. It's not that even the maps are small its just all the maps set you up for close range everywhere.

usually no1 fights over the sniper when I'm on D in high grounds I can usually walk over and pick up there sniper because no1 likes it because its semi hard to shoot someone in the head, there for they pick a gun like shotty which shoots farther than the Ar, or a mauler and run and hide in corners for the easy R+B combo.Lazer isn't really important unless theres cars driving around or you're on a map that you have to be on D. In slayer its pretty pointless because everyone looks at you and just shoots and if you get the lazer off you can get 1 kill and then just take the death.

I agree on the Os before it was just like lawl i got over shield and run and take 4 shots from a sniper, But to Nerf it down to the point where its still 2 shots from a sniper or like 3 extra bullets from an AR or like maybe half a foot closer with a shotty and not much of a diff with any gun, is just plain dumb, the only time i grab it is when someone is attacking me just to piss them off and turn invincible and then kill em.

the Br should and always should be a medium range weapon, and the sniper should be long range, when was the last time someone was a mile away and shot a guy hiding in a bush with a m16 or something??? if there across map they should have no chance against you, if there medium range then they shouldn't have a good chance against you, thats balance, balance isn't making it so every gun can shoot cross map and kill people when there like 5 feet away with one shot, a single needle is stronger than 3 nades plus a rocket, a single little pistol shotty is stronger than a giant hammer that can fling cars and people miles away. Also nerfing melle to make it so even if you suck at reaction time you can still beat down people that hit the button a second in advance.

theres no balence in this game, its just who can have the maulars or shotguns.

If you don't believe me play a FFA on Guardian, what does everyone go for shotty's or maulers, you see people go up like 5 or 6 kills then they stop at that for about a min because they died and lost there stuff, then maybe a min or 2 they get another 5 or 6 kills then die again and it restarts, its not even fun, its who can whore the shotty the most.